I did that, but sold my R7 after 3 months due to the AF issues, lack of 3rd wheel, and the different ergonomics from the R5. Get the lens when possible. However, I note that many comparisons between the RF 200-800 and the RF 100-500 with the 1.4TC are favorable. (420-700 @ f/10.0)
Not shooting. There will be so many shots of this on the internet, I see no reason to shoot it. I will watch it from my house with my dogs.(it will be partial where I am in MD.) Just not an interesting thing to me.
I may photograph my dogs while the event is happening as the light changes. Will...
Gave it some heavy use yesterday, and found no issues on a Wintel machine. Only issues I have had is with running some plug-ins that I am a Beta tester for. The non-Beta version of that plug-in works fine. (Guess that's why they have Beta testers. LOL)
If you think you get Sigma focus pulsing on the R5, the R7 will make you pull your hair out. (Tried a friends sigma on my R7.) Just sold my R7 to MPB. The R7 is a $1k camera and for that it's great, but R5/R6 is way better. Interestingly if you take the 7DMk II price at its intro (2014) and...
Not it's not. I download to my desktop, then write to a dedicated card I have for FW upgrades. All updates, lenses and bodies are retained in my Canon folder on my hard drive.
The quicker readout speed makes a faster electronic shutter possible for Stacked BSI CMOS models, plus allows for faster autofocus response for higher burst rates with autofocus. Stacked CMOS chips improve upon the BSI CMOS concept. They place components in a similar arrangement, but the design...
To the OP:
I have the R5, but also the OM-1. The QPAF and the BSI stacked sensor are winners.
Hope the R5MkII goes that way. More important to me than a Mp bump.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.