Other Walking Around Lens

[timm]

Many of my photos are taken serendipitously while I'm driving, taking short hikes, or simply exploring the yard. I don't have a large assortment of lenses, but I use the RF-S55-210mm kit lens the most. That focal length range is flexible for my R100 and the things I like to photograph. I've been considering a higher-quality lens in a similar range, but I'll rent one first to decide if it's worth the expense.

That said, I am curious. What's your go-to lens for walking around? The one you leave on the camera if you're not planning to shoot something specific.

 

[TwoWheeler]

RF 85mm macro. Long enough to get moderate distance shots, wide enough to get some stuff and close focus capabilities.

The RF 100-400 also is a good "one lens to rule them all".

 

[ShipleyNW]

For me, a walking-around lens needs to have a good wide end, preferably going to a 24mm FF-Equivalent.

On an APS-C camera (which make very good walking around bodies) I still use an old EFS 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 (24-136mm FFE). I wish they'd make an RF version of that lens, but I'm not holding my breath. On a DSLR, that lens was short and stubby. On an RF body with a converter, not so much.

For a long time I used an EFS 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 (29-216mm FFE.) The last version of that lens, the Nano version, was a nice lens and I could live with something like that. I guess the RFS replacement is the RFS 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3. Has anybody used that lens?

When I'm shooting FF, I generally take out a full kit, but if I could only take one lens, it would be hard to pass on a good-old 24-105mm f/4.

 

[timm]

The RF 100-400 also is a good "one lens to rule them all".

I have one of those and enjoy using it. But, for casual stuff it's a little big to tote around for my tastes.

Tim

 

[TwoWheeler]

I have one of those and enjoy using it. But, for casual stuff it's a little big to tote around for my tastes.

I have a small sling bag that holds the R5, the 85 and the 100-400. That's my "casual" kit.

Actually it's my only kit... I have a larger Shimoda backpack for longer treks but it holds the same camera gear...and a bunch more crap like lunch.

 

[timm]

I have a small sling bag that holds the R5, the 85 and the 100-400. That's my "casual" kit.

Actually it's my only kit... I have a larger Shimoda backpack for longer treks but it holds the same camera gear...and a bunch more crap like lunch.

My casual kit is just the R100, a wrist strap, the RF-S55-210mm, and a spare battery tucked in my pocket. I don't own too much gear yet, everything will fit in a smaller LowePro camera backpack I have.

Tim

 

[MSH411]

I use the RF 24-240mm as my casual hiking and travel lens but your RF-S55-210mm pretty much covers the range. Have you thought about a 1.4x extender you could just stuff in a pocket. I bought a JCC neoprene case for mine and it's not to bad to carry.

 

[THXGEEK]

I use the RF 24-240mm as my casual hiking and travel lens but your RF-S55-210mm pretty much covers the range. Have you thought about a 1.4x extender you could just stuff in a pocket. I bought a JCC neoprene case for mine and it's not to bad to carry.

+1

Another vote for the 24-240mm.

Many folks may poop on it for not being a fancy 'L' lens, but it gets the job done and is highly rated by real photographers.

 

[timm]

+1

Another vote for the 24-240mm.

Many folks may poop on it for not being a fancy 'L' lens, but it gets the job done and is highly rated by real photographers.

I do not own any of the L series lenses. I'm a hobbyist and retired! Aside from my original kit lenses, I have purchased two RF-series lenses. My thinking is that one day, if I upgrade my camera body, I won't have to replace them.

Tim

 

[StevenAunan]

In urban walkabouts, I vacillate between the RF 24-105mm F4 and the EF 15-35mm F2.8, but I prefer having the wider angle and wider aperture.

 

[Ferenc MÓGOR]

+1

Another vote for the 24-240mm.

Many folks may poop on it for not being a fancy 'L' lens, but it gets the job done and is highly rated by real photographers.

+2 for the RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM lens. This is my zoom test from Lisbon, Portugal (24/38/76/240mm). I think it got the job done!

• Join to view EXIF data.

• Join to view EXIF data.

• Join to view EXIF data.

• Join to view EXIF data.

 

[JackC]

My choice for walk-around all purpose lens is the RF 18-150mm. With the R7 it is very easy to carry and gives me a good choice of shots. Carried that combo on hiking holidays in Scotland, Italy and Portugal with no wish for anything more. If I know I am going for birds/wildlife then it is R7 and older EF S 55-250mm with adapter.

 

[Wings and Things]

The EF-S 55-250 served me well for a while beforE I went full frame. Then I bought a used EF 24-105 L Mk1 which was lovely until the aperture cable broke. I replaced it with the RF non-L version and even though the EF L one has been repaired, I just like having the lighter weight to carry around so I have reluctantly parted with the EF. My wife has the RF 24-240 which I do like for a bit of extra range when she doesn't need it.