Pro Member
- Followers
- 35
- Following
- 300
- Joined
- May 28, 2021
- Posts
- 204
- Likes Received
- 1,355
- Name
- PhotoJim58
- City/State
- Arcata, Ca.
- CC Welcome
- Yes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The 28-70 is an f2.0 and is amazing. I rented it and want to buy it one day.That would be amazing if it is! I’m debating on getting the RF 28-70 f/2.8 for a landscape and walk-about lens…a 24-105 f/2.8 would be worth waiting for!
What kind of photography were you doing with it? Would it be a good walk-about lens?The 28-70 is an f2.0 and is amazing. I rented it and want to buy it one day.
I'm intrigued by the f/2.0, but the lens is just so FAT!! However, I still would have easily chosen it over the 24-70 f/2.8 if it also had 24 mm at the wide end despite the extra 'fatness' and cost it would have.The 28-70 is an f2.0 and is amazing. I rented it and want to buy it one day.
I’m presuming it would be huge given the focal range and aperture?What kind of photography were you doing with it? Would it be a good walk-about lens?
I think it may cost $2400 and that would not compete with the RF24-105f4l. It also sounds like it would much heavier than the RF 24-70f2.8LI don't buy it. Why would they cannibalize their own RF 24-105 f/4 and the super excellent RF 24-70 f/2.8. It will be bigger/heavier than both and probably more expensive then the RF 24-70 f/2.8.