Birds Bittern - 400mm & 800mm

Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

R7andyking

Newcomer
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Posts
18
Likes Received
23
Points
0
Name
Andy King
Bittern1 400mm crop.JPG
  • Join to view EXIF data.
Bittern2 800mm crop.JPG
  • Join to view EXIF data.
 
I couldn't figure out how to include a comment with the photos!
I took these yesterday - the first time I've ever seen a bittern.
R7 with 100-400 at 400mm f10 1/640 ISO400; then with 2x extender at 800mm f18 1/640 ISO 1250 and I was surprised at the colour difference between the images. Any thoughts?
 
Were you in auto white balance?

It would be interesting to see these shots cropped to the same framing, showing the bird clearly (same size in both). Then we would be able to compare image quality between cropping and using the 2x teleconverter (assuming focus was accurate in both shots).
 
Last edited:
Thanks Archibald. Yes I was in AWB. Here is another crop with the birds about the same size. I was surprised that the 800mm image is better quality when cropped in this tight.
Bittern3 800mm crop.JPG
  • Join to view EXIF data.
Bittern2 400mm crop.JPG
  • Join to view EXIF data.
 
Yeah, interesting! The one with the 2x TC looks better.
 
Since you mention AWB I assume you were shooting in .jpg format. The camera's software that edits .jpg image files is the cause. There are lots of factors that go into how it interprets an image. In RAW they would be roughly the same although the exposure might vary due to the metering taking in a larger field of view on the 400mm shot.
 
Since you mention AWB I assume you were shooting in .jpg format. The camera's software that edits .jpg image files is the cause. There are lots of factors that go into how it interprets an image. In RAW they would be roughly the same although the exposure might vary due to the metering taking in a larger field of view on the 400mm shot.
Thanks for ressponding Chris and for the insights. I was shooting in both .jpg and CRAW and you are right they are roughly the same - I'm very much learning at the moment!
 

Latest reviews

  • Canon EOS R6
    5.00 star(s)
    A nice camera specially if you want to save some money
    I bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...
    • ctitanic
  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM
  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania

New in the marketplace

Back
Top