Lightroom File Renaming with Burst Mode Shooting

JayAy

Well Known Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Followers
2
Following
1
Joined
Mar 29, 2021
Posts
114
Likes Received
171
Name
Julian Ayling
A tale of simple folk (me - I'm quite simple) fighting with automation (Lightroom Import file naming and Library display)

EOS R


For just over a year I've been using my EOS R and happily renaming my files on import to Lightroom Classic using this date and time format:

YYYY-MM-DD-Hour-Minute-Second

This has met my needs without any obvious issues with the EOS R for two main reasons:

1. I hardly ever shoot burst (continuous) mode
2. The absolute maximum frame rate on the EOS R is 8fps and I've never seen anything like that achieved.

On the rare occasion that I had more than 1 image per second, Lightroom seemed to have managed to add an extra digit to the file name without any problem. The numbering was a little odd but I could understand this as as I was once a lazy software engineer and the solution met the spec, sort of. I could live with it. The file renaming numbering was sequential in line with the capture time and all made sense:

2021-04-08-11-25-18
2021-04-08-11-25-18-2
2021-04-08-11-25-18-3

EOS R5


I now also have an EOS R5 and thought I'd test that 20fps electronic shutter. All worked as expected on the camera and I was able to get 20fps, but there was a little more flickering in the viewfinder than I'd hoped for. When I imported the images into Lightroom things took a turn for the worse. As you can see below, the renaming was out of sequence with the shooting order, and it changed from import run to import run:

Camera File NameCapture TimeLRC File Name First Import RunLRC File Name Second Import Run
798​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-022021-04-09-10-10-02
799​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-22021-04-09-10-10-02-3
800​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-42021-04-09-10-10-02-2
801​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-32021-04-09-10-10-02-5
802​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-52021-04-09-10-10-02-4
803​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-62021-04-09-10-10-02-6
804​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-82021-04-09-10-10-02-7
805​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-72021-04-09-10-10-02-8
806​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-92021-04-09-10-10-02-9
807​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-102021-04-09-10-10-02-10
808​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-122021-04-09-10-10-02-11
809​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-112021-04-09-10-10-02-12
810​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-132021-04-09-10-10-02-13
811​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-142021-04-09-10-10-02-14
812​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-152021-04-09-10-10-02-15
813​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-162021-04-09-10-10-02-16
814​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-172021-04-09-10-10-02-17
815​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-192021-04-09-10-10-02-18
816​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-182021-04-09-10-10-02-19
817​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-202021-04-09-10-10-02-20

My initial reaction was to Google the solution. I could find quite a few complaints and quite a few complicated solutions requiring far too much manual intervention, but I thought a simple change to the Library sort order, from Capture Time to File Name, would fix it for me. Then I realised that the files were definitely out of shooting sequence because the Preserved File Name order was wrong. Not only that but the Lightroom sort order puts the first file of the sequence, 2021-04-09-10-10-02, right at the end of the imported images for that second in the library. Clearly this was no good.

I decided to go back to the Import file naming rules to see what I could do, and hit upon using the Filename number suffix on the end of my rule:

YYYY-MM-DD-Hour-Minute-Second-Filename number suffix

Camera File NameCapture TimeLRC Filename Final Import Run
798​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-798
799​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-799
800​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-800
801​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-801
802​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-802
803​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-803
804​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-804
805​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-805
806​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-806
807​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-807
808​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-808
809​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-809
810​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-810
811​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-811
812​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-812
813​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-813
814​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-814
815​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-815
816​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-816
817​
10:10:02​
2021-04-09-10-10-02-817

So I'm back to being happy with the file naming in Lightroom, well almost. I'd prefer it if the suffix was zero padded so the file names were always the same length 0001 to 9999 then over to 0001 again, but I'll live with what I've got, for now.

All testing done with Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic build [202103041821-226a1211] (yes that's really what it's officially called!) on Windows 10 20H2 build 19042.867
 
I am more than a little late in reading this but thank you for the great tip,
 

Latest reviews

  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Back
Top