This is something I have never heard anyone doing!

What’s risky? For people that do this, it’s not their only backup and they’re still moving the images to their computer for editing. They just aren’t deleting them from the old cards. And they’re avoiding the risk of wearing out an SD card and having it fail on them.

Not the cheapest choice, but compared to what people spend at Starbucks, it’s pretty cheap.
Risky because the cards are something you can lose? And how many cards would you have to save? Hundreds? Just seems hard to manage and very expensive. There's so many good options to safeguard the files it just seems to defeat the whole purpose of the cards.
 
Last edited:

Latest reviews

  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Back
Top