To post on the internet I reduce the pixels

John Deer

Newcomer
Pro Member
Pro Member
Followers
0
Following
0
Joined
Feb 28, 2021
Posts
5
Likes Received
8
Name
John Eriksson
from 8192 x 5464 to 1800 x 1200 or 1.72 MB from 49.63 MB that's quite a drop when you pay for the internet. But can any one see the difference?
_63A5322 1s.jpg
  • Canon EOS R5
  • EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM
  • 400.0 mm
  • ƒ/10
  • 1/1600 sec
  • ISO 800
 
I doubt anybody who doesn’t have an 8K or higher resolution display can see a difference , at least on a screen. In a big print, maybe.

By my math, a 13x19 print needs (or can display a max of ) 22Mp. An iPad maybe 6Mp. A 4k desktop monitor 8Mp, an 8K 32Mp.

Depending on how you plan to display an image, pixel count allows you leeway to apply sharpening tools and techniques, or allows you to do heavy cropping; e.g. if you shot a hummingbird at 25 yards.
 

Latest reviews

  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Back
Top