News Canon RF 16-28mm F2.8 IS STM Announced

Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

Tim Mayo

Administrator
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2021
Posts
1,445
Solutions
2
Likes Received
1,368
Name
Tim
Country
United Kingdom
City/State
Shropshire
CC Welcome
  1. Yes
Canon has announced the RF 16-28mm F2.8 IS STM, a fast wide-angle full-frame zoom with a slightly more budget friendly price tag of $1,149.00 in the US or £1,249.00 in the UK.

Canon-RF-16-28mm-f2-8-IS-STM-Lens.png


The lens is constructed from 16 elements in 13 groups, with 2 aspherical lenses and 4 UD elements. At its long end, it has a minimum focusing distance of 0.2m (7.9"). The lens is weather sealed to provide some protection against dust and moisture.

A lead-screw type stepper motor is used for focusing and it also features optical image stabilization, rated for 5.5 stops of compensation at the center of the lens, or up to 8 stops when paired with a camera body.

The lens weighs around 445g (15.7oz) and is 91mm (3.6") long when retracted. It uses 67mm filters and can be paired with an EW-73E lens hood which is sold separately.

Pre-orders are already available at B&H Photo and other official Canon retailers.



 
I miss Rudy Winston! There was something so reassuring in his voice as he told you about new gear.
 
I do agree. Comfort in his knowledge and reassurance in his delivery.
 
I probably won't replace my RF15-35mm F2.8 L IS USM
...even though the new lens is less expensive.
😂
 
My EF 17-40mm f4 L just died and it's in for a warranty replacement from MPB. I'd like to ask them if I can pay the difference for the EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM, but is there a compelling reason to spend an additional $600 for the RF 16-28mm?
 
My EF 17-40mm f4 L just died and it's in for a warranty replacement from MPB. I'd like to ask them if I can pay the difference for the EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L II USM, but is there a compelling reason to spend an additional $600 for the RF 16-28mm?
I don't own EF glass, but you are going from an F4 to an F2.8 and the RF has IS, lighter weight, smaller filter (67mm), better quality and sharpness, faster smoother autofocus. But you know that with your current RF glass.

You have my permission 👍
 
the RF has IS, lighter weight, smaller filter (67mm), better quality and sharpness, faster smoother autofocus.

You have my permission 👍
Ha ha! Thanks. I'm saving up for the RF 200-800 right now, because my elderly father wants to take a family cruise to Alaska and I figure that's the lens I need. I think I'll just let MPB replace my EF 17-40 and then start saving for the RF 16-28. Because you're right. :geek:
 

Latest reviews

  • Canon EOS R6
    5.00 star(s)
    A nice camera specially if you want to save some money
    I bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...
    • ctitanic
  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM
  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania

New in the marketplace

Back
Top