Pro Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2023
- Posts
- 151
- Likes Received
- 452
- Points
- 63
- Name
- Stephen
What we want: More telephoto reach.
What we have: EOS M6 II (plus three lenses - 32 f/1.4, 11-22, and 18-150) and we also have an RF 100-400 f/5.6-8 (purchased for my RF mount camera - I’ve since purchased the 100-500 and have four other RF lenses. 16, 35, and 85 consumer primes and the 24-240).
What we’re pondering: Do we get the EF-EF-M adapter and purchase the Canon EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS II USM and use on the M6II? Or keep the RF 100-400 and pick up an R10? With the R10 + RF 100-400 being a sharp and relatively light weight kit.
Cost isn’t that far off getting one body vs one adapter and one lens. And the weight is actually in favor of the 100-400. And the improved AF is of interest.
What we have: EOS M6 II (plus three lenses - 32 f/1.4, 11-22, and 18-150) and we also have an RF 100-400 f/5.6-8 (purchased for my RF mount camera - I’ve since purchased the 100-500 and have four other RF lenses. 16, 35, and 85 consumer primes and the 24-240).
What we’re pondering: Do we get the EF-EF-M adapter and purchase the Canon EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS II USM and use on the M6II? Or keep the RF 100-400 and pick up an R10? With the R10 + RF 100-400 being a sharp and relatively light weight kit.
Cost isn’t that far off getting one body vs one adapter and one lens. And the weight is actually in favor of the 100-400. And the improved AF is of interest.