Compare EF - RF lenses

Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

Greg

Well Known Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2021
Posts
283
Likes Received
108
Points
0
Name
Greg Sinclair
Country
United Kingdom
City/State
Telford
I read somewhere, could have been on RFShooters or another forum cannot remember, the assumption the new RF lenses were just re-clothed EF with a RF mount.

I believe the RF are all new technologies. I'm thinking of getting a 85mm f1.2 RF and looked to see if the EF would do, obviously a lot cheaper. That was until I used this site to compare the 2 lenses

 
You won't be disappointed with the 85mm. It's SO fast and sharp. It IS heavy, however, and takes up a lot of real estate in the bag. My arms get fatigued after holding it more than a few minutes and it shows in camera shake, even with IBIS. I have to use the tripod if I'm going to take more than a few photos. (And I've been using dumbbells to cope!) It's gotten better, but I thought I should mention it.

If you want the very best in a portrait lens, with a razor sharp focus, paper thin depth of field, and creamy smooth bokeh, it is definitely the lens to have. The forearms like Popeye are just an added bonus. LOL
 
The forearms like Popeye are just an added bonus. LOL
I've been going to the gym for a long time, lifting a few kilos is nothing, although I am reluctant to schlep everything with me on my back. My R5 camera and even the 24-240 RF is not what I would call excessive. I like its mass, it acts as ballast where a compact camera could wobble in your hands, this lot just anchors you.
 
Yes, I do like the balance, especially with the grip added to the camera. I mention the weight not specifically to you, but to anyone that might be reading the forums also weighing their choices on lenses. For some, weight can be a deciding factor when adding to their kit, especially when fatigue can contribute to problems in focusing.
 
Yes, I do like the balance, especially with the grip added to the camera. I mention the weight not specifically to you, but to anyone that might be reading the forums also weighing their choices on lenses. For some, weight can be a deciding factor when adding to their kit, especially when fatigue can contribute to problems in focusing.
I had given a lot of thought about the weight. If you buy a full size sensor camera you have to expect a big camera and that comes with big lenses. It's all going to be heavy

We have been spoiled by capable compacts, I have a Canon IXUS 255HS, it weight just 142 grams. That's less than 1/10 of a R5 with RF 24-240mm
 

Latest reviews

  • Canon EOS R6
    5.00 star(s)
    A nice camera specially if you want to save some money
    I bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...
    • ctitanic
  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM
  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania

New in the marketplace

Back
Top