Pro Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2022
- Posts
- 11
- Likes Received
- 6
- Points
- 0
- Name
- Lasse Vågsæther Karlsen
- Country
- Norway
- City/State
- Porsgrunn
- CC Welcome
- Yes
I don't know why, but I was under the impression that Lightroom Classic was unable to handle cRAW, and that I had to use DPP4 to process them, hence I have just configured the camera for RAW and promptly forgot all about it.
Today I tested, and I found that both Lightroom Classic and DxO PureRAW 2 processed the file just fine.
So, given that my own tests, and various articles and Youtube videos all seem to conclude that there isn't a perceivable difference between the two, is there any technical issues with just going for cRAW full time?
Note, I'm specifically *not* asking if you think or feel there is an image quality difference, I'm asking if there is something I won't be able to do, like any particular kind of software that can't use it or whatnot, that should prevent me from using cRAW? Obviously, if you have experienced notable image quality differences I am interested in hearing it, but I'm really just asking if going cRAW would actually be a showstopper in some cases, specifically with software support or similar.
Today I tested, and I found that both Lightroom Classic and DxO PureRAW 2 processed the file just fine.
So, given that my own tests, and various articles and Youtube videos all seem to conclude that there isn't a perceivable difference between the two, is there any technical issues with just going for cRAW full time?
Note, I'm specifically *not* asking if you think or feel there is an image quality difference, I'm asking if there is something I won't be able to do, like any particular kind of software that can't use it or whatnot, that should prevent me from using cRAW? Obviously, if you have experienced notable image quality differences I am interested in hearing it, but I'm really just asking if going cRAW would actually be a showstopper in some cases, specifically with software support or similar.