I now have the ef-s 24/2.8 and rf 50/1.8 lenses as my walkaround kit on the R50.
Probably 80-90% of my photos are taken with the 24mm, have always liked the 35 to 40mm eqivalent since I had a Nikon F3.
But maybe this ratio would change if I had a zoom lens, I’m often too lazy to change lenses.
I do need at least f2.8 for baptising services in our church where I always take the photos.
So I was wandering if there would be any negative points when I buy a Sigma 18-50mm.
I know I would lose a bit of shallow dof from the 50/1.8 but the difference is not much compared to f2.8
Probably 80-90% of my photos are taken with the 24mm, have always liked the 35 to 40mm eqivalent since I had a Nikon F3.
But maybe this ratio would change if I had a zoom lens, I’m often too lazy to change lenses.
I do need at least f2.8 for baptising services in our church where I always take the photos.
So I was wandering if there would be any negative points when I buy a Sigma 18-50mm.
I know I would lose a bit of shallow dof from the 50/1.8 but the difference is not much compared to f2.8
