How many lenses you have?

Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

View Latest Canon RF Lens Deals At: B&H Photo

tpatana

Well Known Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2021
Posts
279
Likes Received
578
Points
93
Name
Tero Patana
Just ordered myself one more, I'm curious how many lenses people usually have? One of my problem is that I shoot lot of subjects so I tend to need various lenses too. I have some number of cheap ones for funsies too, plus couple old EF-S lenses I haven't used in ages. Not sure how many I actually have but around 15 lenses (RF/EF/EF-S) I think :)
 
3 RFs so far. The 24-105 F4 kit, 100-400 F5.6, and the 100 F2.8L Macro.
Got a Nikkor-EL enlarger lens to play with reverse-mounting for macro, but that doesn't really count. Plan on getting the RF100-500 at some point, and maybe the L version of the kit lens. That's probably it! Don't think I'd need 15 lenses! I imagine it's a different game if you're pro.
 
Well I'm not pro myself so I'm curious how many lenses the actual pros have :)

I just shoot plenty and need different lenses for different items. One of the "funsies" lenses I have is manual Nikon lens that fits reverse on extension tubes for crazy macro. Haven't probably used that in 5+ years, I should consider selling it.
 
Only 3 RFs now. The 16mm F2.8, 24-240mm F4-6.3 & 100-500 F4.5-7.1L. I like the 24-240 for its versatility on a walkabout so I can travel relatively light. I sold my EF/EF-S lenses, including an EF 100-400 L, to help fund the change.
 
4 RF, 5 EF including the super fun 65mm MPE which is probably the only EF lens I will never sell.
 
All RF lenses now...

800mm F11
100-500mm
24-105mm F4
15-35mm F2.8
50mm F1.8
35mm F1.8 Micro
 
I own 2 RF zoom lenses so far; the 24-105mm and the 70-200mm f/4.
I own 3 prime RF lenses, 16mm, 50mm f1.8 and the 35mm f1.8 macro.
I own the Lensbaby 85mm Velvet in the RF mount
As far as EF lenses I own the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 AF, Canon 40mm f/2.8 Pancake, Canon EF 85mm f/1.2II, Tokina 100mm f/2.8 macro, Sigma ART 135mm f1.8 and 2 zooms; the Tamron 18-400mm EFS and the Tamron 150-600mm G2 lens. Also the Lensbaby Composer with 35mm and 50mm optics
 
Looks like we're neighbors :) I'm at Totem Lake.

Any particular reason why you have 800 instead of 1.4x for the 100-500?
I have the 1.4x as well, I got the 800mm first with the 1.4x. I picked up the 100-500 later. Sold my Sigma EF 150-600. Always nice to meet locals.
 
I have the 1.4x as well, I got the 800mm first with the 1.4x. I picked up the 100-500 later. Sold my Sigma EF 150-600. Always nice to meet locals.

I sold my Sigma 150-600 last week, today got my 100-500 :) Planning to get also the 1.4x.
 
For my R5 I currently have :

RF ....

24-70 f2.8
28-70 f2
70-200f2.8
100-500 ...

I've sold ...

RF

15-35 f2.8
50 f1.2
85 1.2
24-105 f4

All of them excellent, incl the ones sold (they just didn't get used as much).
 
For my R5 I currently have :

RF ....

24-70 f2.8
28-70 f2
70-200f2.8
100-500 ...

I've sold ...

RF

15-35 f2.8
50 f1.2
85 1.2
24-105 f4

All of them excellent, incl the ones sold (they just didn't get used as much).
Do you often use your 24-70 instead of 28-70? Sometimes I considered getting the 24-70 too but only good reason I see is it being smaller and lighter, and for those situations I'm usually happy with my 35mm.
 
I do use the 24-70 a lot, yes. It is 'inferior' to the 28-70 but not hugely ... more different as the f2 lens is remarkable.

I prefer the 24-70 on the R5 unless I am going somewhere specifically where I know the 28-70 will come into it's own.

The only issue with the 28-70 is it's weight but the IQ is simply stunning. Sharpness is OMG and I love the lens full stop ... but realise the weight is an issue in a rucksack with, say, the RF70-200 f2.8.

As an example, I will be walking around Winchester (UK) next week with the 24-70 as opposed to the 28-70 as the images I take will suit that lens just ideally. If I felt I was going to take images where I needed the 28-70 then that would be in the bag.

I am currently using both lenses equally ... but my 'true love' is the 28-70 if that makes sense.
 
I have a wide variety (more than I should, I'm sure... lol) 8.

RF: 16mm 2.8, 35 1.8, 50mm 1.8, 70-200mm 2.8, (lensbaby) 35mm 2.8 burnside

EF: (sigma) 14-24mm 2.8, (tamron) 24-70mm 2.8, (Canon) 400mm 2.8 (non-is), 2x TC, (Sigma) 150-600mm 5.6-6.3

It is on my list to transition my EF glass to RF versions but that's a lot of money...
 
RF: 100-500L, 24-105L, 100L macro, 35, Samyang 14
EF: 85, 70-200 f/4L, Sigma 50 f1.4
I transitioned my EF Sigma 24-105 and Canon 100 to RF within the past year, and my old EF 20 to the Samyang. I’ll probably keep the Sigma 50 forever - I love the look the lens gives me.
 
RF-S 18-150, EF 100-400, EF 8-15, EF 24-105, Tamron 90 macro. If I can get the special price on the RF 100-400 I will certainly add that
 
I like to travel light and to keep it simple;

RF 800 f11 - for bird captures, 75% of my photography is with this lens
RF 24-105 f4 L - for general purpose and sightseeing/travel
RF 85 f2 macro - for portrait and macro
NiSi 15 F4 - for wide-angle and abstract. The manual lens seems a strange choice, but its beautifully made, does lovely sun stars, is good value and Dustin Abbott likes it!
 
RF-S 18-150, EF 100-400, EF 8-15, EF 24-105, Tamron 90 macro. If I can get the special price on the RF 100-400 I will certainly add that
RF-S 18-150,
RF 100-400, Black Friday deal!
EF 8-15,
EF 24-105,
EF 100-400,
Tamron 90 macro
 
RF
14-35 F/4L
24-104 F/4L
24-240 F/4-6.3 - I travel a lot for work and this is the perfect travel lens. Makes it easy take just one lens with me.
100-400 F/5.6-8
85 F/2

EF
50 F/1.8
28-135 F/3.5-5.6
70-300 F/4.5-5.6
75-300 F/4-5.6
Tamron 28-70 F/2.8
Tamron 70-210 F/4

EF-S:
18-55 F/3.6-5.6
55-250 F/4-5.6
18-135 F3.5-5.6
 
RF 24-70 f/2.8
RF 50 f/1.8

When I had Nikon full-frame, I used to have 5 lenses. I didn't like switching lenses more than I had to, so my goal now is to keep it more simple. I definitely want the RF 70-200 f/2.8 (if/when it ever goes on a bit of a sale) and maybe an 85 mm some day, but that's as far as I want to go. (Oh crap - that's almost as bad as before!) Besides, RF glass is a LOT more expensive!
 
So far I have no RF lenses but have Sigma 60-600mm, Canon EF 100mm 2.8 macro, Canon EF 100-400-I, Canon 24-70 2.8 and Tamron 14-35 I think.
I'm giving my 100-400 and 14-35 to my Granddaughter who is taking photography in college, so subtract 2 of the ones I just listed. I'm down to 3.
I pretty much have the bases covered in these three from 24mm to 840mm when I use the 1.4 teleconverter on the Sigma.
 

View Latest Canon RF Lens Deals At: B&H Photo

Latest reviews

  • Canon EOS R6
    5.00 star(s)
    A nice camera specially if you want to save some money
    I bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...
    • ctitanic
  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM
  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania

New in the marketplace

Back
Top