Pro Member
- Followers
- 0
- Following
- 0
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2023
- Posts
- 117
- Likes Received
- 389
- Name
- Stephen
Playing around with this feature using my RF 85 f/2 and the R6II. First, I learned that if you go too shallow it won’t work. I tried at f/2 and it just wouldn’t composite the image.
So then I did f/4 with 30 images:
After than I tried f/2.8 and 30 images:
Followed by f/2.2:
As is obvious, the same number of images comprised overall image depth because each sliver is that much narrower.
So finally, 90 images at f/2.2. I can see some artifacts in the background blur but overall a pretty decent jpeg for minimal effort:
Is there one that you all prefer?
So then I did f/4 with 30 images:
- Canon EOS R6m2
- RF85mm F2 MACRO IS STM
- 85.0 mm
- ƒ/4
- 1/3 sec
- ISO 100
After than I tried f/2.8 and 30 images:
- Canon EOS R6m2
- RF85mm F2 MACRO IS STM
- 85.0 mm
- ƒ/2.8
- 1/5 sec
- ISO 100
Followed by f/2.2:
- Canon EOS R6m2
- RF85mm F2 MACRO IS STM
- 85.0 mm
- ƒ/2.2
- 1/8 sec
- ISO 100
As is obvious, the same number of images comprised overall image depth because each sliver is that much narrower.
So finally, 90 images at f/2.2. I can see some artifacts in the background blur but overall a pretty decent jpeg for minimal effort:
- Canon EOS R6m2
- RF85mm F2 MACRO IS STM
- 85.0 mm
- ƒ/2.2
- 1/8 sec
- ISO 100
Is there one that you all prefer?