RF24-105 L f2.8?

[PhotoJim58]

Is a Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8L IS on the way? [CR1]

 

[LaurieAndersonPhotography]

That would be amazing if it is! I’m debating on getting the RF 28-70 f/2.8 for a landscape and walk-about lens…a 24-105 f/2.8 would be worth waiting for!

 

[RedCobra]

I don't buy it. Why would they cannibalize their own RF 24-105 f/4 and the super excellent RF 24-70 f/2.8. It will be bigger/heavier than both and probably more expensive then the RF 24-70 f/2.8.

 

[PhotoJim58]

That would be amazing if it is! I’m debating on getting the RF 28-70 f/2.8 for a landscape and walk-about lens…a 24-105 f/2.8 would be worth waiting for!

The 28-70 is an f2.0 and is amazing. I rented it and want to buy it one day.

 

[LaurieAndersonPhotography]

The 28-70 is an f2.0 and is amazing. I rented it and want to buy it one day.

What kind of photography were you doing with it? Would it be a good walk-about lens?

 

[lostnomore]

The 28-70 is an f2.0 and is amazing. I rented it and want to buy it one day.

I'm intrigued by the f/2.0, but the lens is just so FAT!! However, I still would have easily chosen it over the 24-70 f/2.8 if it also had 24 mm at the wide end despite the extra 'fatness' and cost it would have.

 

[jontarbuck]

What kind of photography were you doing with it? Would it be a good walk-about lens?

I’m presuming it would be huge given the focal range and aperture?

 

[RDM5546]

I don't buy it. Why would they cannibalize their own RF 24-105 f/4 and the super excellent RF 24-70 f/2.8. It will be bigger/heavier than both and probably more expensive then the RF 24-70 f/2.8.

I think it may cost $2400 and that would not compete with the RF24-105f4l. It also sounds like it would much heavier than the RF 24-70f2.8L