Taos Pueblo

Kamoshika

Well Known Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Followers
6
Following
4
Joined
Jan 15, 2023
Posts
440
Likes Received
1,808
Name
David
Some shots of Taos Pueblo from a few weeks ago. Hadn't been to the place in many, many years. Pretty much the same except the admission price: 25 bucks a head. I remember when it was free.
Taos1.jpg
  • Canon EOS R6m2
  • RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM
  • 22.0 mm
  • ƒ/11
  • 1/200 sec
  • ISO 100
Taos2.jpg
  • Canon EOS R6m2
  • RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM
  • 23.0 mm
  • ƒ/11
  • 1/400 sec
  • ISO 160
Taos3.jpg
  • Canon EOS R6m2
  • RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM
  • 16.0 mm
  • ƒ/11
  • 1/320 sec
  • ISO 200
Taos4.jpg
  • Canon EOS R6m2
  • RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM
  • 14.0 mm
  • ƒ/11
  • 1/320 sec
  • ISO 160
Taos5.jpg
  • Canon EOS R6m2
  • RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM
  • 20.0 mm
  • ƒ/11
  • 1/400 sec
  • ISO 250
Taos6.jpg
  • Canon EOS R6m2
  • RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM
  • 19.0 mm
  • ƒ/11
  • 1/400 sec
  • ISO 200
Taos7.jpg
  • Canon EOS R6m2
  • RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM
  • 20.0 mm
  • ƒ/11
  • 1/400 sec
  • ISO 160
 
Nicely done, maybe a tad on the darker side than what I would have expected.
Thank you. It was quite a bright day--was going for more of a subdued look. Here's one of the color originals:
TPcolor.jpg
  • Canon EOS R6m2
  • RF14-35mm F4 L IS USM
  • 19.0 mm
  • ƒ/11
  • 1/400 sec
  • ISO 200
 
Great set, and the extreme sunlight does make exposure difficult. BRIGHT sunshine and deep shadows are difficult to capture, but it looks like you did a fine job. I was in Taos a LONG time ago and, as I would expect, it hasn't changed much based upon your photos. My images are all on film (which I should scan digitally) and back then you had to get a $5 photo "permit". You were free to photograph anything except people. I don't believe that there was any concern over commercial use, though I suspect that if you brought a tripod that things would be different.
 
Thank you. It was quite a bright day--was going for more of a subdued look. Here's one of the color originals:View attachment 20488
I understand. Maybe stronger contrast with a little brighter image could be striking. All said these are your photographs and your sensibilities rule.
 
I understand. Maybe stronger contrast with a little brighter image could be striking. All said these are your photographs and your sensibilities rule.
Thanks. I always appreciate feedback.
 

Latest reviews

  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Back
Top