People Portrait with RF 28-70

jeffagoldberg

Newcomer
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2021
Posts
9
Likes Received
35
Name
Jeff Goldberg
First time shooting with the RF 28-70 F/2. Wow. Except for the size/weight, I loved it. This was a VERY small space, yet you can still create really nice bokeh.
 

Attachments

  • 20210405_Rachel_305.jpg
    20210405_Rachel_305.jpg
    418.7 KB · Views: 193
Welcome to the group, Jeff. Beautiful capture and model. It's an awesome lens, isn't it? Every time I shoot a few photos and load them on my computer, it amazes me. Prime captures in a zoom lens. It inspires me to get out and push myself to see what I can do with it.
 
@MaraLee First off, thank you. Yes, the lens is impressive. I shot for about 3 hours with it and I could feel the tension in my arm. :-) For small spaces, nothing else can compete. But when I have more space, I am going with the lighter ones.
 
Weight is a problem with the R camera range, its the price we pay for quality. I know a tripod can be yet another lump to carry about, is it not the obvious choice in doors, especially for portrait work? Or at a minimum, to take the weight use a mono pod. Whenever I feel the necessity I use a tripod and remote shutter on my phone
 
Weight is a problem with the R camera range, its the price we pay for quality. I know a tripod can be yet another lump to carry about, is it not the obvious choice in doors, especially for portrait work? Or at a minimum, to take the weight use a mono pod. Whenever I feel the necessity I use a tripod and remote shutter on my phone
The RF 70-200 seems to be half the weight of the EF version. It is my usual go-to lens. For small areas, no choice but to go with the F/2. Life is trade off. I get it. Also part of the fun. :-)
 
I believe the RF 70-200mm F2.8 is about a pound lighter than the older EF version. Works for me. Ounces = pounds and pounds = pain ;)
 
Ounces, pounds. One of the few things the USA and UK have in common. You have to be over 60 in the UK to realise that 🙂
 
First time shooting with the RF 28-70 F/2. Wow. Except for the size/weight, I loved it. This was a VERY small space, yet you can still create really nice bokeh.
My RF 28-70 stays mounted on my camera because in most cases it’s my first choice. Nice pic!
 
First time shooting with the RF 28-70 F/2. Wow. Except for the size/weight, I loved it. This was a VERY small space, yet you can still create really nice bokeh.
My RF 28-70 stays mounted on my camera because in most cases it’s my first choice. Nice pic
 

Attachments

  • A5379692-C1BB-4768-AEBE-6C1604AB2ED7.jpeg
    A5379692-C1BB-4768-AEBE-6C1604AB2ED7.jpeg
    968.8 KB · Views: 195
In weight, yes, they are the same. Fluid ounces, however, are not the same.
Fluid ounces confuses me with recipes and their cup size.

The Americans have a problem reading the difference between inches and centimetres - Mars Climate Orbiter. I know it was over 20 years ago. I wonder why they are 1 of very few countries not using the metric system by law?
 
First time shooting with the RF 28-70 F/2. Wow. Except for the size/weight, I loved it. This was a VERY small space, yet you can still create really nice bokeh.
I like the way the bokeh imitates the female's curles
 

Latest reviews

  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM
  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania

New in the marketplace

Back
Top