People Portrait with RF 28-70

jeffagoldberg

jeffagoldberg

Newcomer
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2021
Posts
9
Likes Received
35
Name
Jeff Goldberg
First time shooting with the RF 28-70 F/2. Wow. Except for the size/weight, I loved it. This was a VERY small space, yet you can still create really nice bokeh.
 

Attachments

  • 20210405_Rachel_305.jpg
    20210405_Rachel_305.jpg
    418.7 KB · Views: 193
Welcome to the group, Jeff. Beautiful capture and model. It's an awesome lens, isn't it? Every time I shoot a few photos and load them on my computer, it amazes me. Prime captures in a zoom lens. It inspires me to get out and push myself to see what I can do with it.
 
@MaraLee First off, thank you. Yes, the lens is impressive. I shot for about 3 hours with it and I could feel the tension in my arm. :-) For small spaces, nothing else can compete. But when I have more space, I am going with the lighter ones.
 
Weight is a problem with the R camera range, its the price we pay for quality. I know a tripod can be yet another lump to carry about, is it not the obvious choice in doors, especially for portrait work? Or at a minimum, to take the weight use a mono pod. Whenever I feel the necessity I use a tripod and remote shutter on my phone
 
Greg said:
Weight is a problem with the R camera range, its the price we pay for quality. I know a tripod can be yet another lump to carry about, is it not the obvious choice in doors, especially for portrait work? Or at a minimum, to take the weight use a mono pod. Whenever I feel the necessity I use a tripod and remote shutter on my phone
Click to expand...
The RF 70-200 seems to be half the weight of the EF version. It is my usual go-to lens. For small areas, no choice but to go with the F/2. Life is trade off. I get it. Also part of the fun. :-)
 
I believe the RF 70-200mm F2.8 is about a pound lighter than the older EF version. Works for me. Ounces = pounds and pounds = pain ;)
 
Ounces, pounds. One of the few things the USA and UK have in common. You have to be over 60 in the UK to realise that 🙂
 
jeffagoldberg said:
First time shooting with the RF 28-70 F/2. Wow. Except for the size/weight, I loved it. This was a VERY small space, yet you can still create really nice bokeh.
Click to expand...
My RF 28-70 stays mounted on my camera because in most cases it’s my first choice. Nice pic!
 
jeffagoldberg said:
First time shooting with the RF 28-70 F/2. Wow. Except for the size/weight, I loved it. This was a VERY small space, yet you can still create really nice bokeh.
Click to expand...
My RF 28-70 stays mounted on my camera because in most cases it’s my first choice. Nice pic
 

Attachments

  • A5379692-C1BB-4768-AEBE-6C1604AB2ED7.jpeg
    A5379692-C1BB-4768-AEBE-6C1604AB2ED7.jpeg
    968.8 KB · Views: 195
Greg said:
Ounces, pounds. One of the few things the USA and UK have in common. You have to be over 60 in the UK to realise that 🙂
Click to expand...
In weight, yes, they are the same. Fluid ounces, however, are not the same.
 
Roger Hopkins said:
In weight, yes, they are the same. Fluid ounces, however, are not the same.
Click to expand...
Fluid ounces confuses me with recipes and their cup size.

The Americans have a problem reading the difference between inches and centimetres - Mars Climate Orbiter. I know it was over 20 years ago. I wonder why they are 1 of very few countries not using the metric system by law?
 
jeffagoldberg said:
First time shooting with the RF 28-70 F/2. Wow. Except for the size/weight, I loved it. This was a VERY small space, yet you can still create really nice bokeh.
Click to expand...
I like the way the bokeh imitates the female's curles
 

Similar threads

C
  • Question Question
Upgrading from M50- Do I go R7 or R10?
Replies
7
Views
276
Philnick
Philnick
JoeTheSnowPlowGuy
  • Question Question
Full Frame Thinking of selling my 24-105 STM and 85 STM…
Replies
3
Views
589
mikey12654
mikey12654
E
Lack of fast long telephoto prime lenses in the RF lineup
Replies
24
Views
1K
RedCobra
RedCobra
BasilFawlty
  • Question Question
Full Frame Sigma 150-600 vs RF 100-500 vs RF 200-800
Replies
13
Views
4K
Dcweather
D
JoeTheSnowPlowGuy
  • Question Question
Other Do New Lenses Lack Character?
Replies
1
Views
459
Archibald
Archibald

Latest reviews

  • Crysania
    Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Crysania
    Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Hali
    Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Pro Membership

If you'd like to support this community you can easily do so by becoming a Pro Member and unlocking the following benefits:

✓ No Adverts in the Forums
✓ Sell Items in the Marketplace
✓ Forum Profile Signature
✓ Custom Profile URL
✓ Profile Cover Photo
✓ Unlimited Gallery Uploads
✓ Higher Resolution Gallery Uploads

If you are already a pro member thank you for supporting the site!

If not, you can join here.

Blog Resources

You might find the following guides over on our blog helpful:

Shopping Links

You can also support this site by purchasing gear through the following affiliate links:

Although we would recommend supporting your local camera store first if you have one.

User Menu

RF Shooters Text Logo

© 2024 RF Shooters. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: RF Shooters is an independently run website and is not affiliated with Canon.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Back
Top