timm
Newcomer
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2025
- Posts
- 4
- Likes Received
- 2
- Points
- 3
- Name
- Tim
- Country
- United States
- CC Welcome
- Yes
I have an R100 APS-C Crop Sensor camera and have been looking at options for a lens with macro capability. My interests are mostly landscapes and wildlife, and the macro aspect interests me because it provides a way to get better photos of some of the smaller things in our outdoor world.
When I look at other RF series lenses, NOT RF-S lenses, you apply a crop factor of 1.6 to get the equivalent focal length. For example, I have an RF-28mm prime lens, which gives me pretty much a "nifty 50" 28mm X 1.6 = 44.8 mm. If I were to get the often-praised Canon RF-100mm macro lens, that would be effectively a 160mm lens on my camera.
Is anyone using this R100/RF-100mm macro combination? How do you like it? What sort of photos do you typically shoot? I'm concerned that 160mm may put me physically too far from my subject.
Would it be better to consider the RF-85mm Macro lens for my particular camera?
Tim
When I look at other RF series lenses, NOT RF-S lenses, you apply a crop factor of 1.6 to get the equivalent focal length. For example, I have an RF-28mm prime lens, which gives me pretty much a "nifty 50" 28mm X 1.6 = 44.8 mm. If I were to get the often-praised Canon RF-100mm macro lens, that would be effectively a 160mm lens on my camera.
Is anyone using this R100/RF-100mm macro combination? How do you like it? What sort of photos do you typically shoot? I'm concerned that 160mm may put me physically too far from my subject.
Would it be better to consider the RF-85mm Macro lens for my particular camera?
Tim