Like everything else, it depends. An acquaintance of mine shoots ±100k images per month. He shoots only JPEG and has dialed in his camera to give him the look he wants. I shot HDR real estate photos for a while. The company I shot for would only accept medium resolution JPEG files. It all comes down to how many images and who the images are for. I shoot all in RAW now but if a particular situation arose that required a large quantity of images, I would seriously consider shooting at least CRAW or JPEG files.
I've come to the conclusion a long time ago with regards to the antagonistic JPG vs. RAW war that shooting JPG is a PITA with all the variables that need to be taken care of in-camera, like WB, sharpness, contrast, saturation, etc. Meanwhile RAW is like "point and shoot" (well almost), but you get it.
Has anyone noted any difference between Raw and CRaw apart from the filesize? I think I read somewhere that CRaw is a lossy format albeit not as much as JPG.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.