I currently have the EF 24-240mm f4-6.3 on my R6II, but I'm thinking about replacing it with the RF 24-105mm f4.0L. I like the idea of a non-variable aperture lens. Has anyone here used both of these lenses? If so, what are your thoughts?
Full Frame RF 24-240mm f4-6.3 vs RF 24-105mm f4.0L?
- Thread starter snegron
- Start date
- Featured
Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum
Be apart of something great, join today!
View Latest Canon RF Lens Deals At: B&H Photo
View Latest Canon RF Lens Deals At: B&H Photo
Similar threads
- Featured
- Question
- Featured
- Question
- Featured
- Question
Latest reviews
-
Canon EOS R50Excellent Beginner's Camera, and a Very Good Enthusiasts CameraThe R50 is a fine entry level/beginner/casual stills camera. It is not a pro level camera, but would be fine for hiking, street, family photos...- SwampGrizz
-
Canon EOS R6A nice camera specially if you want to save some moneyI bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...- ctitanic
-
Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USMLong Story Short Review10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
- GaryM
