RF 70 - 200 - Debating if I should buy one.

[Kathryn Milner]

I have contemplated purchasing an RF 70 - 200 f4 but I want to limit the weight in my camera bag. I also have limited space in my camera bag without using a bigger, heavier one. I have an RF 100 - 500. I know the 70 to 200 is lighter but is there any benefit to shooting with a 70 - 200 over what I can shoot with the 100 - 500 other than weight.

 

[DrQandil]

I was torn between 2.8 and 4 versions and decided on the f/4 due to weight. Remember it is also an L lens, I don't think Canon would compromise on the f/4 just because it is slower. AF is very fast, it is very light and very baggable. I am happy with the choice but have only walked the sidelines at my son's spring football practices with it so far (photo below). I also shoot wildlife as a hobby, and the 70-200 might go along, but the 100-500 and the 800/11 are my go-tos. That 800/11 is an amazing lens in the field.

I got the f4 too, it is very small and light weight compared to EF version or the f2.8 EF and RF versions. I like the pictures it produces.