What made you switch to Canon RF mirrorless?

lostnomore

Active Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2023
Posts
58
Likes Received
41
City/State
Alberta
With all the different brands, systems, and formats out there, what made you specifically choose a Canon RF mirrorless camera? I hope this might be insightful to others searching out there and confused by all the choices.

As for my story, I had a Nikon D750 DSLR for 6-1/2 years and then decided to switch to mirrorless. I chose the Canon R6 because I was absolutely SHOCKED at the speed and accuracy of the AF, something that people weren't actually raving about regarding the Nikon Z6 II or Z7 II. Why not Sony? I CANNOT STAND their ergonomics and their bodies are just not comfortable for me to grip.

I also wanted to stick with full-frame despite the bigger size, weight, and cost versus APS-C or Micro Four-Thirds. Full-frame images have less noise at high ISO and there's so much more post-processing latitude.

So my main reasons for switching were 1) what I perceived to be the phasing out of DSLRs in short order and 2) the insane(!!!) AF of Canon RF mirrorless. Oddly enough, a third reason why I went with the R6 was the fully-articulating LCD.

The transition was a little rough at the start. It took me quite a while to wrap my brain around how to configure the various AF modes Canon-style, but once it all 'clicked' I realized actually how simple it is. Although it was far easier on my D750 to select what items to add to My Menu versus the R6 equivalent, I like that I can choose more items than on the D750. I love how there are so many buttons on the R6 that can be customized with all sorts of different options – and just the customizability of the camera in general. I like many of the littler things about the R6, like how custom shooting mode settings can be auto updated if one chooses.

The two things I didn't expect to be blown away by is the capabilities and responsiveness of the LCD touch-screen and the absolutely amazing MF peaking mode when using manual focus. No more trying to figure out the hyperfocal distance with landscapes - you see exactly what's going to be in focus and what isn't!

If there's only one thing I'm a little nervous about, it's the inability to back-up your camera settings. This is inexcusable at this price point and I was able to do this even on the much-older D750. If one ever has the camera reset for whatever reason, they can't simply import the settings from a backup SD card. They have to set everything up from scratch. I've created a couple of docs with all my setting choices if it should ever come to this, but what a time-consuming hassle!

The bottom line is that I liked how the D750 was like the "multi-tool" or "Swiss Army knife" of cameras - it did a whole lot of things really, REALLY well. I wanted the equivalent in mirrorless and I believe I found it in the R6, yet to a way better degree overall. I have very little regret about the switch, in other words.
 
45 mps.
 
I was already up to my neck in expensive Canon gear so I stayed put. The R5 was the what made me jump in to mirrorless, the initial offerings were not tempting. The jump from the 1DX2 to the R5 was the greatest leap forward in any single new camera purchase since I bought my first DSLR.
I'm not 100% happy, the auto focus struggles to find the target in a confused background..eg bird in a bush....even with single AF point.... where the 1DX nor any of my DSLR's had that problem, I also have had incidences where I have been frustrated by having to switch the camera off when it overheats. I don't have a back up at the moment which is a drawback, overall though as I previously said best upgrade in years. I have just installed the latest firmware so it will be interesting to see if there is any noticeable improvement.
If I was starting out again would I choose Canon? Who knows. I did once swop from Nikon then a few years later regretted it slightly when Nikon were leading the way it appeared. Nowadays I don't have that much gear due to being burgled last summer so if I was to change now would be a good time but I don't have the inclination right now.Happy where I'm at.
 
I had no intention of getting a RF mirrorless Canon. I had been thinking of getting a new or new to me all purpose lens for my Rebel DSLR. After searching without much luck I happened to stop at a local camera store (that I normally would never go in to) while shopping with my wife at a mall here in Calgary. The guys working that day said “we just got one of these crop sensor camera and lens packages in, maybe have a look at it”. Lens was exactly what I was looking for, all my existing gear would work (with adaptor) and I would be replacing a 14 year old camera with one of Canons newest. After a lot of debating the pros/cons, meeting up with the Better Half and discussing it with her over lunch she said “ Let’s just go back and get it”. I do Love both her and the R7.
 
Much like you I was a Nikon shooter, shooting wildlife almost exclusively. A pair of D500's were my primaries with a D750 as my main for everything else. I bought a Z6ii in May 2021 planning to transition to it from the D750 and was impressed though the AF tracking lagged somewhat. Over Memorial Day I visited a Canon pro shooter who had been trying to get me to switch for 5 years. He handed me an R5 with 100-500mm and I was dumbfounded. He allowed me to shoot with it for a weekend and I immediately started the Nikon sell-off. I missed the reach of the DX D500 w 500mm, but the number of keepers I'd get and the accuracy of the AF was amazing.

I have no regrets, but seeing things like the 800mm Z PF released have given me pause. But I'd rather have the 100-500mm RF than the 100-400mm Z any day of the week, and with the R7 I get the reach - I just wish it had come in at $500 higher with a buffer and processor that can manage the AF system. That would have been an amazing wildlife camera. Maybe the R7ii?
 
I agree with Ken (advanced focus and superb EVF) though I had no legacy EF lenses at the time - I'm a former Nikon shooter. Being able to see the histogram, along with the effects of my chosen exposure all in the EVF, was a real game changer for me and made the decision to change so much easier. Additionally weight was a concern as DSLRs plus glass have gotten pretty hefty and hauling that combo around started to become tiresome
 
I'd been a Canon user for years and like Dave, I had/have a lot of Canon lenses. I also really like the Canon menu system, and I've used a lot of different systems. The fact that the AF was amazing and the EVF was so nice was just icing on the cake and had me move over early on, I was glad to lose some of the weight of my SLR's.
 
Canon user since film. I had been using aps-c's (10d, 20d, 40d, 70d) when I switched to FF 6d MKII.

I thought the 6d MKII would be great a step up from APS-C. I was mistaken. The R and RP were out but not getting rave reviews for action/sports photography. When the R5 and R6 were announced, the reviews coming back were good,

I was so disappointed in the 6d MKII that I considered switching back to APS-c - the 90d. The main reason I went mirrorless is that the EVF had improved so much. All the eye tracking AF and other things were not that important. I ordered the ef-rf adapter and all has been good. But I did start replacing the ef with rf glass.

Now if Canon could add pro-capture.........
 
With all the different brands, systems, and formats out there, what made you specifically choose a Canon RF mirrorless camera? I hope this might be insightful to others searching out there and confused by all the choices.

As for my story, I had a Nikon D750 DSLR for 6-1/2 years and then decided to switch to mirrorless. I chose the Canon R6 because I was absolutely SHOCKED at the speed and accuracy of the AF, something that people weren't actually raving about regarding the Nikon Z6 II or Z7 II. Why not Sony? I CANNOT STAND their ergonomics and their bodies are just not comfortable for me to grip.
crappy AF in the Nikon Z6 is main reason. I was missing focus on 25% of my shots with Nikon. Now with Canon my out-of-focus rejects are almost zero!
 
A beginner rank beginner. Got passion back for a few reasons. After 35yrs.

Storm weather photography my passion then birds and farms and everything that goes on.

Rp was first camera great in lowish light and storms and stills.

Talked to many storm photographers and birders. Storm guys r6 no brainer night and day shots. Birders R5 but R6 second choice this is before the 7 came out.

Chose r6
 
I've been with Canon since my AE-1 then EOS 5 QD, 20D, 40D, 70D. Wasn't overly impressed by the early R series cameras and was thinking of getting a 90D when the R6 launched. I borrowed an R6 through the Canon scheme and was impressed by the autofocus capabilities (I like shooting birds in flight, my dog on the move) so I bought one. The question now is whether to move to the Mark 2?
 
From Sony.

For me was the AF features included in a very good price.
 
I've been a Canon covert going back to my first 20D.

A few years ago I was shooting with a 7D MkII mostly for wildlife and the grandkids' sports and a 5Ds which I mainly used for landscape and portraiture. I had previously added the Canon M system for my first mirrorless adventures and really liked them and owned several models and MF lenses, I still shoot with the M5. The R had been out for a year or so and was having some price drops and I liked the M5 so much I figured the R system would be a logical move. As much as I loved the fine quality of the 5Ds images I found the huge 50+mp files slow in processing and taking up a lot of hard drive space. Also the 5Ds was not designed for speed and low light performance wasn't stellar. So I sold it and picked up a Canon R through CanonPriceWatch with one of their low "street price" deals. As I recall the camera store was in Canada. While the R has some limitations and is not as advanced as the R5 and R6 variations it works fine for me. I now have the R7 which has relegated my 7D MkII to the camera closet for now as a backup or loaner camera. Not much resale value in it I found out.

I mostly used my EF lenses with the adapter at first but over time switched over to RF for several focal lengths, I have 5 of them now.
 
Like many others, I have a lot of other Canon gear, so compatibility was the BIG factor. Then for me, the sensor size, capabilities and price tag (in that order) of the R6ii made it a slam dunk for me. Now to save my shekels for that F2 zoom lens. ;)
 
Had to sale my old photo gear to put money into a rental we bought. I had an 5d mkIII, 7D plus 5 "L" Len's. When I finally saved the money back to replace the gear the R5 had just came out and figured that was the future. NO regrets.
Also got the 24-105L and the 100-500L. Next up I want to get the 15-35L and hopefully the 600f4 L.
 
I had a 6D mk1 and wanted to stay full frame. I had not been pleased with the auto-focus of the 6d or the 7d before it. I wanted more focus points and a touch lcd screen with touch focus...and better performing auto-focus. The Canon EOS R provided all of that. It actually re-energized my desire to do photography. I love it. I know that the newer cameras are better in some ways, but the EOS R is the best camera I have ever owned and I will probably stick with it until I try to do something that it can't handle. So far, it is far ahead of my game.

Oh...and not having to micro-adjust the auto-focus for each lens is wonderful. Best decision photographically I have made in over 30 years.
 
I have been a Canon user for many years and was very comfortable with my 5D MKIII. Looking for higher resolution and improved autofocus. Tried both the Nikon and Sony cameras at a camera store and decided that their menu systems suc ... were not very intuitive or maybe as consistent as the Canon systems. Also, the ergonomics are best on Canon for me. Many of the lenses and other accessories worked well with the new Canon R series although I have converted most lenses to RF lenses because they are both an exceptionally good improvement and I'm investing in the lenses as much as the camera bodies which will inevitably change. Great lenses, consistent menu system, very good ergonomics, the complete package was more complete and comfortable. I did not see any features in either Nikon or Sony that were so compelling as to make me change.
 
Like so many here I had read about the r5 but just didn't have the budget and I was shooting with the 1DX and very happy with the results.
I had the Canon 400 f2.8 lens that I had been using for several years, but it weighed in at 13 lbs plus the 1DX and a 2X tele-converter for a total of around 16-17 lbs. I was hand holding this heavy beast most of the time but had a tripod and gimbal mount for those places that I could use it. The images were impressive if I do say so myself. When the r5 came out I was ready for s something lighter and smaller so I ordered one and it was back ordered. While I was waiting someone approached me and wanted to buy my 400 f 2.8 with tripod and gimbal so I sold it. Then I had a dilemma, no long range lens. I didn't have the budget for the r5 and a long lens so I cancelled the camera and bought the sigma 60-600mm f6.3 lens instead. As time went by my 1DX just quit one day and no parts were available to repair it. This is when I made the decision to purchase the r5 a second time and I've not regretted it at all.
I have found the r5 and the 60-600mm Sigma to be a great match up and with a canoe 1.4 converter it comes in at 84-840mm and f6.3-f9 even faster than the RF 600 and 800mm. For now I'm extremely happy with the combination. I'm posting a couple of images taken last week. Thanks for putting up with this long post.
 

Attachments

  • 20230126-_E7A0101.jpg
    20230126-_E7A0101.jpg
    318.7 KB · Views: 87
  • 20230126-_E7A0422.jpg
    20230126-_E7A0422.jpg
    395.3 KB · Views: 88
  • 20230126-_E7A9640.jpg
    20230126-_E7A9640.jpg
    300.3 KB · Views: 86
  • 20230126-_E7A9443.jpg
    20230126-_E7A9443.jpg
    731.5 KB · Views: 84
I have been a Canon digital shooter since the Canon D30 back in the early 2000's. I progressed through various Canon APS-C cameras until switching from a 7D to a full-frame 6D a couple of years ago. I loved the full frame sensor, but hated the auto focus. I had also been using a Sony RX-100 as my pocket/carry around camera and really liked the tilting lcd screen.

So...I wanted better auto focus, full frame and a tilting lcd screen and also wanted a touch lcd screen. So, I bought an EOS R and I love it. I don't have any RF glass yet and am completely happy with my EF lenses with an adaptor. So, mirrorless Canon was one of the best camera decisions I have made in my almost 30 years of photography.

I actually don't want to try one of the newer full-frame Canon mirrorless camaras because I know that I will want one badly. So I will resist a bit longer and probably buy a good used one in the next year or two.
 
With all the different brands, systems, and formats out there, what made you specifically choose a Canon RF mirrorless camera? I hope this might be insightful to others searching out there and confused by all the choices.

As for my story, I had a Nikon D750 DSLR for 6-1/2 years and then decided to switch to mirrorless. I chose the Canon R6 because I was absolutely SHOCKED at the speed and accuracy of the AF, something that people weren't actually raving about regarding the Nikon Z6 II or Z7 II. Why not Sony? I CANNOT STAND their ergonomics and their bodies are just not comfortable for me to grip.

I also wanted to stick with full-frame despite the bigger size, weight, and cost versus APS-C or Micro Four-Thirds. Full-frame images have less noise at high ISO and there's so much more post-processing latitude.

So my main reasons for switching were 1) what I perceived to be the phasing out of DSLRs in short order and 2) the insane(!!!) AF of Canon RF mirrorless. Oddly enough, a third reason why I went with the R6 was the fully-articulating LCD.

The transition was a little rough at the start. It took me quite a while to wrap my brain around how to configure the various AF modes Canon-style, but once it all 'clicked' I realized actually how simple it is. Although it was far easier on my D750 to select what items to add to My Menu versus the R6 equivalent, I like that I can choose more items than on the D750. I love how there are so many buttons on the R6 that can be customized with all sorts of different options – and just the customizability of the camera in general. I like many of the littler things about the R6, like how custom shooting mode settings can be auto updated if one chooses.

The two things I didn't expect to be blown away by is the capabilities and responsiveness of the LCD touch-screen and the absolutely amazing MF peaking mode when using manual focus. No more trying to figure out the hyperfocal distance with landscapes - you see exactly what's going to be in focus and what isn't!

If there's only one thing I'm a little nervous about, it's the inability to back-up your camera settings. This is inexcusable at this price point and I was able to do this even on the much-older D750. If one ever has the camera reset for whatever reason, they can't simply import the settings from a backup SD card. They have to set everything up from scratch. I've created a couple of docs with all my setting choices if it should ever come to this, but what a time-consuming hassle!

The bottom line is that I liked how the D750 was like the "multi-tool" or "Swiss Army knife" of cameras - it did a whole lot of things really, REALLY well. I wanted the equivalent in mirrorless and I believe I found it in the R6, yet to a way better degree overall. I have very little regret about the switch, in other words.
A year of researching Nikon, Sony and Canon. I was moving from film to digital and encouraged to go mirrorless. After researching I leaned to the Canon RF system and have been happy with my choice since purchasing my R5. Very pleased with the camera and choice of RF lenses/gear.
 
The main reasons I switched to the R5 from my old 5D and 7D was the eye focusing and fast from rates for bird photography. With that being said I wanted to stay with Canon because I love their ergonomics and build quality. Also top notch customer service.
What has blown me away about the R5 and mirrorless system was the ability to see a good approximation of what the image will look like in the viewfinder a big help in bird photography. The viewfinder in the R5 is top notch.
I was looking at the R6 because I didn't think I needed the megapixels of the R5 but I really wanted the better weather sealing so that is why I went to the R5. Now that I understand how much those extra pixels handle cropping for faraway birds I am, glad I made that choice.
The R5 and R6 both have much better dynamic range than the older DSLR's and handle noise much better as well.
The one negative is battery life, although not terrible in not as good as my older cameras.
I have shot on the R5 for over 2 years now and will never go back to DSLR's even though I loved them.
 
With that being said I wanted to stay with Canon because I love their ergonomics and build quality.

I forgot to say this same thing in my post. We have a friend that is a Nikon shooter and I have fiddled around with pushing buttons, looking through the viewfinder etc., and I am always reminded that I am a Canon shooter. I know that I could learn to "communicate" with a Nikon, but a Nikon camera and I don't really "understand" each other. Sort of like when I moved to Germany 13 years ago and was a beginner German speaker.

Could I learn to use and enjoy a Nikon? Probably...but everytime I handle a Nikon I always get some sort of skin rash on my hands....;)🤣😂🤣
 
Hoo boy...
Am I a traitor?
Just added a OM system OM-1 with a M.Zuiko 300mm f/4 lens to my gear.
I opted for this as it is FF equivalent 600 mm f/4 and was less money than a RF 600 f/4 and the camera and lens is half the weight of the RF 600 alone.
First shot. And no I won't post anymore OM pics in the RF forum.
20230210-_2100038_DxO.jpg
 
Traitor? Don't be silly, brand loyalty is in itself stupid as the brand doesn't care about individuals. You have to decide what's the best route to travel on a personal basis and go with what ever is the best value for money route at the time you make a decision on a potential purchase.
I also don't understand the need of individuals to brag about what gear they own, who cares!
 
Hoo boy...
Am I a traitor?
Just added a OM system OM-1 with a M.Zuiko 300mm f/4 lens to my gear.
I opted for this as it is FF equivalent 600 mm f/4 and was less money than a RF 600 f/4 and the camera and lens is half the weight of the RF 600 alone.
First shot. And no I won't post anymore OM pics in the RF forum.
View attachment 13261
as long as you are having fun photographing anything any camera you like is just fine.
 
I posted earlier on this thread but forgot to talk about IBIS. Just would like to say that I have a few handheld images shooting @ 500mm and a 1/15 exp. Maybe not the sharpest of my images but defiantly usable. IBIS in congestion with lens IS is a BIG winner for me.
 
Hoo boy...
Am I a traitor?
Just added a OM system OM-1 with a M.Zuiko 300mm f/4 lens to my gear.
I opted for this as it is FF equivalent 600 mm f/4 and was less money than a RF 600 f/4 and the camera and lens is half the weight of the RF 600 alone.
First shot. And no I won't post anymore OM pics in the RF forum.
View attachment 13261
Not a traitor. You go with what you’re comfortable using. Well done with photo included.👍👍
 

Latest reviews

  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Back
Top