Wimberley MH-100

Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

BasilFawlty

Well Known Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2023
Posts
214
Solutions
1
Likes Received
174
Points
43
Name
Ψ
I’ve been thinking about getting a head for my Sirui Monopod. Specifically the MH-100. Just wondering if anyone has any experience with this monopod gimbal head?
 
I use my MH-100 on my Sirui SVM-165 and it works like a champ. Once you get the balance dialed-in, using larger lenses (like the 200-800mm) is effortless!

(I still use a hand-strap, as I've been known to have the occasion brain-fart and forget that I'm using a monopod and not a tripod and let go of things.... )

Highly recommended!
 
I use my MH-100 on my Sirui SVM-165 and it works like a champ. Once you get the balance dialed-in, using larger lenses (like the 200-800mm) is effortless!

(I still use a hand-strap, as I've been known to have the occasion brain-fart and forget that I'm using a monopod and not a tripod and let go of things.... )

Highly recommended!
Thanks for that. Does the fact that the weight is off to the side and not directly over the monopod center cause any issues for you.
 
I have the Sirius L-10. It is not a gimbal, just a single-axis head. Works fine for me. Is there a reason to have a gimbal on a monopod?

 
I have both the Sirui L-10 and the Wimberly MH- 100 (actually the Leophoto version which is a direct copy for less money, the MPG-01). I am off to the Pantanal where it is possible to use a monopod from the boats and have been sitting on my porch switching between the two to decide which to take with my RF 100-300 f/2.8 (heavy sucker.)
With the weight centered (Sirui) the rig tends to easily lean left and right and can be tough to keep a vertical balance. The Leophoto seems to be better with the heavy lens, as with the lens on the right, I can hold the knob of the gimbal with my left hand, and since the weight is on the right (so pulling to the right only) it seems easier to keep vertical. With the Sirui, that heavy lens, has much worse balance issues for me.
YMMV.

ps: my shooting buddy has the Wimberly MH-100 and we shoot side by side a lot, and the Leophoto version is truly identical to the Wimberly except for the knob color, and it cost $40 or so less.
 
I have both the Sirui L-10 and the Wimberly MH- 100 (actually the Leophoto version which is a direct copy for less money, the MPG-01). I am off to the Pantanal where it is possible to use a monopod from the boats and have been sitting on my porch switching between the two to decide which to take with my RF 100-300 f/2.8 (heavy sucker.)
With the weight centered (Sirui) the rig tends to easily lean left and right and can be tough to keep a vertical balance. The Leophoto seems to be better with the heavy lens, as with the lens on the right, I can hold the knob of the gimbal with my left hand, and since the weight is on the right (so pulling to the right only) it seems easier to keep vertical. With the Sirui, that heavy lens, has much worse balance issues for me.
YMMV.

ps: my shooting buddy has the Wimberly MH-100 and we shoot side by side a lot, and the Leophoto version is truly identical to the Wimberly except for the knob color, and it cost $40 or so less.
Interesting! Thanks.
 
Is there a reason to have a gimbal on a monopod?
Well, it’s just that I’ve seen some videos of that particular gimbal head in practice and it looks like a very smooth easy way to do bird shooting with a monopod.
 
Well, it’s just that I’ve seen some videos of that particular gimbal head in practice and it looks like a very smooth easy way to do bird shooting with a monopod.
There's also the much cheaper Weyllan PH3.
 
I have the Sirius L-10. It is not a gimbal, just a single-axis head. Works fine for me. Is there a reason to have a gimbal on a monopod?

Steve Perry might answer the question better:

 

Latest reviews

  • Canon EOS R6
    5.00 star(s)
    A nice camera specially if you want to save some money
    I bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...
    • ctitanic
  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM
  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania

New in the marketplace

Back
Top