Gimbal or Ball head???

Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

Woodbadger

Active Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2023
Posts
64
Solutions
1
Likes Received
100
Points
33
Name
Ian Layton
Greetings! I am a birdeatcher and have used a superzoom bridge camera (SX50) over hthe years mainly for record shots.
I recently got an R7/RF 100-400 combo to “up my game”. I am especially intrigued with shore birds and to that ends I am looking at building my own “ground pod”. I have purchased the iShoot collar but now I am a bit stuck as to how to mount it. I have seen implementations using both gimbal and ball heads. Seems like the gimbal is a bit of overkill for my kit, but could prove useful in future for a replacement of the QR4 bideo head on my Benro tripod, which is mainly haed to support my spotting scope. On the other hand I wonder about the lower price pint and smaller size of a ball head.
Anybody have any experience of this kind of setup (ground pod, tripod head, zoom lens) and preference for head type?
TIA
 
Solution
A full Gimbal would be your solution, then, although it's a bit of an overkill for the lens, but it's an essential tool for any serious bird photographers. Or, just connect the iShoot collar on a ball head directly. You'd just have to loosen the ball head knobs while shooting and tighten when done.
Thanks. Yes, I was thinking maybe overkill. Seeing as I will probably not be doing much high-speed panning and “up-down” for this particularapplication, I will probably go with a mid range ball head for now. In the future, if (when? Grin) I go with a bigger lens, I will look at getting a decent gimbal to accommodate both the ground pod AND my regular heavy duty tripod.
I've done a DIY "ground pod" using an old roasting pan, but for my deck bird photography. I've done another DIY "ground pod" with much smaller footprint. Either case, I used a ball head and a Gimbal "sidekick" (ProMediaGear GT2 Tomahawk), which isn't a full Gimbal. Alternatively, you'd also use Wimberley MH-100 MonoGimbal and mount it on a ball head.
 

Attachments

  • 20190711_140229.jpg
    20190711_140229.jpg
    348 KB · Views: 91
  • 20190711_140547.jpg
    20190711_140547.jpg
    429.9 KB · Views: 88
I've done a DIY "ground pod" using an old roasting pan, but for my deck bird photography. I've done another DIY "ground pod" with much smaller footprint. Either case, I used a ball head and a Gimbal "sidekick" (ProMediaGear GT2 Tomahawk), which isn't a full Gimbal. Alternatively, you'd also use Wimberley MH-100 MonoGimbal and mount it on a ball head.
Thanks for the reply and photos. Unfortunately the iShoot collardoes not allow for rotation since it has cutouts for the control buttons on the lens, so a side mount solution does not work for me.
 
A full Gimbal would be your solution, then, although it's a bit of an overkill for the lens, but it's an essential tool for any serious bird photographers. Or, just connect the iShoot collar on a ball head directly. You'd just have to loosen the ball head knobs while shooting and tighten when done.
 
A full Gimbal would be your solution, then, although it's a bit of an overkill for the lens, but it's an essential tool for any serious bird photographers. Or, just connect the iShoot collar on a ball head directly. You'd just have to loosen the ball head knobs while shooting and tighten when done.
Thanks. Yes, I was thinking maybe overkill. Seeing as I will probably not be doing much high-speed panning and “up-down” for this particularapplication, I will probably go with a mid range ball head for now. In the future, if (when? Grin) I go with a bigger lens, I will look at getting a decent gimbal to accommodate both the ground pod AND my regular heavy duty tripod.
 
Solution

Latest reviews

  • Canon EOS R6
    5.00 star(s)
    A nice camera specially if you want to save some money
    I bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...
    • ctitanic
  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM
  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania

New in the marketplace

Back
Top