Macro - Close up Lenses VS Extension Tubes

Kwazy

Well Known Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2022
Posts
287
Solutions
2
Likes Received
324
Name
Mike
Country
United States
City/State
Rhode Island, US
CC Welcome
  1. Yes
Would anyone like to share their experience or thoughts about using close-up lens attachments and extension tubes?
What is the difference? Pros and cons of both? Combinations?
 
They effectively are trying to do the same thing, which is allow you to get more magnification. The difference is close up lens attachments are adding additional glass elements and often times they are not nearly as good quality. There are a few that are good, but in general, they cause additional distortion, fringing, etc. Extension tubes don’t add any additional glass elements into the mix. I am not entirely sure of the drawbacks, which I am sure there are, but they are good cheaper alternatives to getting more magnification.

I think the biggest drawback from either is effectively reducing your usable working distance; having to get even closer to the subject. Hope someone else will jump in to give a little more insight.
 

Latest reviews

  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Back
Top