Photography Challenge - Motion Blur

One more. Barred Owl shaking it's groove thing. Nice talons too.


8E7A5564 Final Final Radiant.jpg
 
I enhanced this "long exposure" motion blur by using firmware 1.8.1 feature IBIS High resolution shot on a moving target. Original file size 242MB.


5000px-4P9A5746.jpg
 
A different kind of motion, and a different sort of blur. The wind moves the water surface which makes the sharp reflection unsharp. I took many of these at Stepstone Falls in Rhode Island. I have a couple of posts about the location and more of distorted reflections.
 

Attachments

  • 646A0104.jpg
    646A0104.jpg
    672.3 KB · Views: 67
  • 646A0084.jpg
    646A0084.jpg
    286.3 KB · Views: 67
  • 646A0054.jpg
    646A0054.jpg
    368.6 KB · Views: 60
  • 646A0052.jpg
    646A0052.jpg
    398.6 KB · Views: 58
Cemel, I love the effect and they have a Monet-like quality. Excellent.
 
While this may look like your run of the mill Long Exposure water shot, it started with a 1/60th exposure at f/9, iso 100.
IMG_5280.jpeg


Then I had an idea. I haven’t really experimented with multiple exposure on my R6II. I didn’t want to get my filters and tripod for this quick road side attraction. So I braced the camera on a fence rail, and set up for a nine shot multiple exposure. Settings were as above. F/9, 1/60th, at ISO 100. Changes were H+ instead of single shot and Multiple Exposure, Continuous Shooting, Average.

IMG_5281.jpeg

Not quite as smooth as an ND with a single exposure, but it kind of maintains the turbulence of the water and conveys motion as well. Notice the exif reads the same as a single shot.

What do you all think?
 
While this may look like your run of the mill Long Exposure water shot, it started with a 1/60th exposure at f/9, iso 100.
View attachment 18422

Then I had an idea. I haven’t really experimented with multiple exposure on my R6II. I didn’t want to get my filters and tripod for this quick road side attraction. So I braced the camera on a fence rail, and set up for a nine shot multiple exposure. Settings were as above. F/9, 1/60th, at ISO 100. Changes were H+ instead of single shot and Multiple Exposure, Continuous Shooting, Average.

View attachment 18423
Not quite as smooth as an ND with a single exposure, but it kind of maintains the turbulence of the water and conveys motion as well. Notice the exif reads the same as a single shot.

What do you all think?
Hi Stephen,

I feel your pain at finding some nice water, but lacking a tripod/ ND - I think the result you have achieved here is very pleasing, so well done to you!

I would also encourage you to check out This Tutorial from Anthony Morganti - if you use Photoshop/ similar it could be another option to consider.

Phil
 
 

Latest reviews

  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Back
Top