Let's talk about eclipse photography

JCBigler

Active Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Followers
0
Following
0
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Posts
27
Likes Received
29
Name
Justice C. Bigler
City/State
Chouteau, Oklahoma
The next full solar eclipse (in the US) is coming up on April 8th.

The family and I drove up to Missouri to experience totality and it was one of the most amazing events I've ever experienced. But I didn't get any good photos as I didn't really know what I was doing. This will be the last one to cover the continental US for 20 years or so. So I want to make sure to get some good photos this time.

I've got a Canon EOS R6 mkII and an EOS RP. (Also have a Black Magic PCC4K but I'll be using that for video of the event rather than the actual eclipse).

Lenses that I have are: RF 70-200 f/4, RF 24-70 f/2.8, RF 24-105 f/4, RF 35mm f/1.8, RF 50mm f/1.8, and the RF16mm f/2.8.

Not a lot of reach there. I'm going to have to either rent a longer telephoto or buy something.

Will the RF100-400 f/5.6-8 provide enough zoom for a good eclipse aroura shots? I assume that the slower aperture won't be such an issue for this type of photography, correct? Should I also get a 1.4x or 2x teleconverter to use with this lens? Or Should I try to rent the RF 100-500 f/4.5-7.1?

I want to get a good totality picture with the aurora, probably with the R6 mkII and the longer zoom lens. And then I want to get a good wider landscape with sequential photos for compositing afterwards with a neat foreground which I thought I would use my RP for. I figure the RP would lend itself to cropping a bit more since it has a few more megapixels than the R6 mkII. Thought maybe I would use the RF70-200 on the RP with the 1.6 crop.

And then there's the issue of powering the cameras for extended periods of time. I've got the battery grip for the R6 mkII. I also have AC adapters, but I would need to find a long lasting battery to plug them into. I have a 95Wh 6600mAh V-Mount battery but I was planning to use that for my BM PCC4K, and an Anker 26000 87Wh power bank battery.

Thoughts?
 
I took photos in 2017 from Salem, Oregon. We were right in the path of totality. Well worth the once or twice in a lifetime experience. Make sure you are as close to the path of totality as possible as it makes a substantial difference in your results.

All I can tell you is what I did as I am no expert when is comes to celestial photography. I will attach one composition photo that gives you an idea of all the pics I took and how they turned out. My results were better than I anticipated, but I studied and prepped months in advance. Ring of fire too.

Equipment used: 7D2, Ef100-400 ver ii, 1.4iii teleconverter, tripod, cable release, solar paper fitted into a UV lens filter as all the load required filters were sold out months ahead of time. I used a 5D3 with the 24-70 F4 for video on another tripod. This equipment ended up being pretty close to perfect, but I ws extended all the way out and still had to crop a tad.

Settings used: Mostly F9, live screen only, Shutter speeds and ISO's ended up around SS50-160 and ISO's were around 400. But the R6, R7 are such better cameras I think you not need worry about that too much. All done in MF as you only have to set it up once and not move it at all.

Batteries were not an issue for me as the camera doesn't use much as it is just intermittent images and the video I just did a minute before totality to a minute after. It worked out really well as it shows daylight to darkness back to daylight and records the oohs and aahss of the crowd and the fireworks that end off getting blasted all over by the neighbors.

With the R62 I would think you would want the 100-500+1.4x or better yet the 200-800 (I think it would be perfect for a solar eclipse) and no tele. The 95mm solar filter might cost a ton, if they even make one, or better yet make your own like I did. R7 would work well too. I even think an R7 with the RF100-400+1.4x would work too, But the F11-F14 might be tough to overcome. Not sure on that.

Anyway I hope you find some of this information useful and just remember this is what I did. It may not work for others and their equipment.
The only advice I can give you is that you can never overprepare for a shoot like this!

Good Luck, Gary
 

Attachments

  • 314E6D78-585E-4091-AA9D-F475D7387239.jpeg
    314E6D78-585E-4091-AA9D-F475D7387239.jpeg
    61.2 KB · Views: 33
  • 5D8BE766-9A24-4D23-A3A3-4E522860D293.jpeg
    5D8BE766-9A24-4D23-A3A3-4E522860D293.jpeg
    97.1 KB · Views: 36
Those are both very cool photos. I love the ring of the stages around the totality.

I definitely want to try to get one of totality with some of the solar flares like your first shot.
 
I'm also planning to try photographing the eclipse, and already own the 100-400mm. I've used it a bunch of times for photos of the moon with my R8, and it's decent, but I'm currently looking at ways to extend my reach for the eclipse so that I don't have to crop as much. I don't have the budget for a longer lens, so I'm thinking probably a teleconverter to pair with the 100-400 I already have.
 
2017 I had good spot in Oregon. Sigma 150-600mm with home-made filter.

T1D_0581.jpg
  • Canon EOS-1D X
  • EF24-70mm f/4L IS USM
  • 53.0 mm
  • ƒ/6.3
  • 1/100 sec
  • ISO 100


5D4_9416-Edit-2.jpg
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
  • 150-600mm
  • 484.0 mm
  • ƒ/8
  • 1/2 sec
  • ISO 400



5D4_9425.jpg
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
  • 150-600mm
  • 484.0 mm
  • ƒ/8
  • 1/500 sec
  • ISO 400


5D4_9417.jpg
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
  • 150-600mm
  • 484.0 mm
  • ƒ/8
  • 1/2000 sec
  • ISO 400


5D4_9402-HDR.jpg
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
  • 150-600mm
  • 600.0 mm
  • ƒ/8
  • 1/6400 sec
  • ISO 800


This time I'm just coming back from another trip so I can't make this one. Please post pics you get from there.
 

Attachments

  • 5D4_9426.jpg
    5D4_9426.jpg
    202.7 KB · Views: 26
Those are both very cool photos. I love the ring of the stages around the totality.

I definitely want to try to get one of totality with some of the solar flares like your first shot.
There is no doubt with all the thought you are putting into it you will!
 
Thanks for the reminder. I shot the last one with stacked ND's (10+6 stop) but have been meaning to get a solar filter for the UV and IR blocking as well. Want to get one before they suddenly run out everywhere.
 
What are everyone's thoughts regarding an R7 for eclipse pics? I've got enough that I could get an R7 and an RF 100-400 f/5.6-8 lens. Or I could get the RF 100-500 f/4.5-7.1 lens.

Since I sold my 60D last year, I don't have a crop sensor camera. And I didn't have any good lenses for it anyway. But the higher pixel count and the crop factor of the R7 seems like it would lend itself well to eclipse photography. An R6 mkII and an R7 seems like they would be a good combo.
 
Someone help me. I’ve gone deep down the rabbit hole of star trackers. I’ve got some wicked GAS going on now and I don’t think my wife is going to be happy. 😬
 

Latest reviews

  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania
  • Canon EOS R6 Mark II
    5.00 star(s)
    Fantastic sport camera
    This camera is FANTASTIC. I'm a dog sports shooter, so very fast indoor action with a lot of obstacles to shoot in and around. This camera does a...
    • Crysania
  • Zoom Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM
    4.00 star(s)
    A good lens for what it does, with it's drawbacks
    I have had this lens since it came out and it is my lightweight go to lens for walking around in the city and using my infrared-converted camera...
    • Hali

New in the marketplace

Back
Top