Noise and Light: DxO Photolab vs Luminar Neo

Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

StevenAunan

Well Known Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2023
Posts
364
Likes Received
741
Points
93
Name
Steven Aunan
City/State
Sacramento, CA
CC Welcome
  1. Yes
Since I regularly use Luminar Neo and DxO Photolab 9, and since I shot some high ISO images last night, I thought I'd post one image processed in both editors. Each image was processed with the software's automatic/recommended settings and no other manual edits. The Head2Head JPG was created in Gimp with a simple copy/paste, no editing except the added words.

1) Photolab: R5II Camera Body rendering, "DxO Smart Lighting," DeepPrime 3 noise reduction.
2) Neo: R5II Camera Faithful profile, "Auto Adjust" Developing, "High" Noiseless setting.

Folsom-Head2Head.jpg


Folsom-DxO.jpg
  • Join to view EXIF data.


Folsom-Neo.jpeg
  • Join to view EXIF data.
 
presume dxo first of the full images slightly ahead and is it NR or use of smart lighting. Tad sharper?
 

Latest reviews

  • Canon EOS R50
    5.00 star(s)
    Excellent Beginner's Camera, and a Very Good Enthusiasts Camera
    The R50 is a fine entry level/beginner/casual stills camera. It is not a pro level camera, but would be fine for hiking, street, family photos...
    • SwampGrizz
  • Canon EOS R6
    5.00 star(s)
    A nice camera specially if you want to save some money
    I bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...
    • ctitanic
  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM

New in the marketplace

Back
Top