Join me, vicariously, on a photographic snipe hunt: one affordable 85mm f/1.2 that fits my Fuji GFX and Canon R5m2.
Now that I have the Fujifilm GFX 100s, I've been hunting for vintage lenses, and the latest quest was for an 85mm f/1.2 that I could adapt to the Fuji
and the Canon. Since I already have the EF-RF adapter, the obvious choice was the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II. Lens in excellent condition: $900. EF-GF autofocus adapter: $500. Total cost: $1400 plus tax.
Ouch. I couldn't justify that, especially since I just got the RF 45mm f/1.2 from B&H and my wife just booked us a Norwegian fjord cruise in June.
So down the rabbit hole I went.
Do I really need f/1.2? Reviewers unanimously agree that manual focus is notoriously difficult on a GFX with a 1.2 lens. So it seemed silly to buy one when I'm not even sure I'd like using it.
TTArtisan GFX 90mm f/1.25 $372
Mitakon GFX 80mm f/1.6 $510
Do I really need to use the lens on the R52? With a sob, I said no.
It took me two days to discover that all of these used lenses will cover the larger GFX sensor:
Rokinon EF 85mm f/1.4 AS IF with AE chip $279
Minolta Rokkor MC 85mm f/1.7 $349
Minolta Rokkor 90mm F/1.4 Leica M $490
Schneider-Kreuznach 80mm f/2.8 LS Mamiya 645 $279
Schneider-Kreuznach 110mm f/2.8 LS Mamiya 645 $576
Canon EF 135mm f/2 L $399
Zeiss Planar T 85mm f/1.4 ZE EF $307
Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART EF $669
Pentax SMCT-67 90mm f/2.8 $329
I was particularly smitten by the Minolta 90mm, the Schneider-Kreuznach and the Zeiss. All required different adapters.
After one final search at MPB, I accidentally found a Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 AS IF UMC in Sony A mount.
Sony A mount? Is that the same as Sony Alpha? I don't know. I've never owned a Sony.
But ... the lens was $96 in Good condition, and Kipon sells a Sony A to Fuji G adapter for $116. So they're both on the way to me now.
Will I like the result? It was worth $236 to find out.