Extenders Canon 1.4x extender

Welcome to our Canon RF Shooters Forum

Be apart of something great, join today!

View Latest Canon RF Lens Deals At: B&H Photo

border guy

Active Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2023
Posts
42
Likes Received
154
Points
0
Name
cliff

Hi all,

I enjoy using my R6ii coupled with the 100-500 lens for wildlife, but on occasions, I find it just a bit too short at 500mm and was thinking of investing in the 1.4x extender. Is anyone on here using that combo and if so are you happy with the results? I have also had a look at Canons 800mm but didn't fancy being stuck with f11 permanently! Did a quick search but couldn't find anything.


Cliff.

 
I don't think I've seen any posts on the 100-500 with 1.4x and the R6 II but here's one with the R5 that you might find helpful:

 
Here is another thread


Consensus at another forum was that cropping might give better IQ than use of the 1.4x TC for zoom lenses, but that the TC would probably win with the big white primes.
 
I have the 2x RF converter and have used it with the RF100-500, it is great for close up work (1-10m) for longer shots I would use the 100-500 without a converter and crop the image, I have ordered the 1.4x for a trip to Iceland as having tried it I like the image quality and the weight comparsion to the 2x. BTW £399 from einfinity at present if that helps :)
 
This shot was taken with a Canon R6MK2 with 100-500mm lens and the 1.4 rf extender.

0W8A2366 copy 2a copy-2.jpeg
  • Join to view EXIF data.
 

Hi all,

I enjoy using my R6ii coupled with the 100-500 lens for wildlife, but on occasions, I find it just a bit too short at 500mm and was thinking of investing in the 1.4x extender. Is anyone on here using that combo and if so are you happy with the results? I have also had a look at Canons 800mm but didn't fancy being stuck with f11 permanently! Did a quick search but couldn't find anything.


Cliff.

I definitely recommend it. Just be aware of its limitations: not a low-light performer (but better than expected, coupled with a camera like the R6ii and NR software) and the 300mm low-end restriction.
 
I use the 1.4x on the R6 quite often with both the 100-500 and 100-400. Attached are a few sample images.
Loses a tad bit of image quality, but not too bad. I often touch up with LR noise reduction and PS spot sharpening.
I also turn off the " Lens drive when AF impossible" and that helps a bit when focusing.

Would imagine the R6ii would be a little better yet.

They have been quite plentiful via Canon refurbished in the states at $399.

BC763BC8-0521-4BCC-A0A6-3B0D1EE469A7.jpeg
  • Join to view EXIF data.


C6A788F7-6CBC-423F-B895-47C7DF562A98.jpeg
  • Join to view EXIF data.


10F30F2D-DE6C-45FC-8D74-E0665DC4C2B5.jpeg
  • Join to view EXIF data.
 
Some fantastic images there guys and some really helpful comments. I think my mind is made up... I'm going for it. probably keep my eyes open for a used one first but I'll see what's on offer.

Thanks, everyone,
Cliff.
 

View Latest Canon RF Lens Deals At: B&H Photo

Latest reviews

  • Canon EOS R6
    5.00 star(s)
    A nice camera specially if you want to save some money
    I bought the Canon R6 in 2024 to replace my Canon R7. After researching the market, I decided to go with the R6 instead of the R6 Mark II. Why not...
    • ctitanic
  • Prime Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Long Story Short Review
    10 years ago.....yes I said it was a long story! Canon sent me an EF 50mm f1.2 for a lens evaluation. On my 5D Mark III it was rather amazing. A...
    • GaryM
  • Zoom Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
    5.00 star(s)
    Fast, sharp, and lightweight! A great lens
    This is my main workhorse of a lens and I love it. It's very light weight (only around 2.3 lbs) lens. I've been able to hand-hold it for an event...
    • Crysania

New in the marketplace

Back
Top